Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Bad Boy

Walter Dean Myers, the author of the memoir titled “Bad Boy,” wrote similar to how Sherman Alexie did with the way the main character within the book is a mirror reflection of his own life. Myers mentioned that after writing this book that he was so emotionally attached to writing this because he felt that his teen years was the most difficult part of his life.
            The book begins with information and thoughts that Walter obtained through childhood memories, family quotes, and other records, all of which took place in his early hometown within Harlem. What made this author interesting was his ability to make readers focus and narrow their attention on many concepts within the book. Although in the early chapters we want to latch on to Walter’s mother and the way she seems to drift from work in order to keep a closer eye on her son, I found myself wanting to learn more of his speech disorder in chapter three when he discusses his early childhood school memories. He wrote of the main characters quick temperament and anger towards his peers as they made fun of him for his speech disorder, so much of which that it led his to punch his tormenter straight in the face. Though I don’t want to summarize the entire book, I was wondering if the common punishment back then of writing sentences on paper as punishment either helped him or influenced him to become a writer? Though I though that childhood incident was interesting, I became heartfelt and almost shocked when I read about his moms way of handling the situation. Even after receiving school punishment, Walter came home to a larger punishment dished out by his mother.
            Walter Dean Myers wrote of such a transformation from a writer’s perspective that was influenced by such early childhood. His young love for reading actually began within classrooms of teachers that believed in him. Yes, Walter was a “bad boy, a very bad boy,” but his teachers promoted his schooling and only wanted him to achieve more. Walter wrote that he was given books and developed a love for reading at a young age. Considering Walter was a quick-tempered and physically strong boy, reading wasn’t seen as a “cool” thing as a student in Harlem, so picking fights was something he had no problem in pursuing. This book had me very emotionally attached that I would in fact recommend this to other readers or teachers to teach in their classroom. I do believe that I would teach it in my class. It lets students and readers learn about customs of others while it is a short-time read at the same time. Though it’s themes were actually quite difficult to grip, the idea of race and conflicts between school and society was there.

            To wrap this up, this memoir reminded me of the novella “The House on Mango Street” by Sandra Cisneros. Its similarities between the short read and the plot of wanting to escape or accomplish something larger than what they were supplied with as children interested me. Because the memoir “Bad Boy” had me interested for majority of the read, I will rate it a B. Of course, I am a very lenient grader, but I do believe that the childhood stories of Harlem in the middle 1900’s allowed the reader to open their eyes to something the probably haven’t read or learned about before.

Monday, November 3, 2014

Unwind

Dystopian books are my favorite, and as long as we are studying young adult literature books, they always will be. Unwind, by Neal Shusterman, addresses a theme head on from the beginning of the novel, pro-life and pro-choice. What makes this interesting is how he wrote this book to relate to young adolescents that me be experiencing some of these issues. However, let me give a quick background of the story and why I happened to love it.
            Considering this book is quite difficult to summarize, bare with me, since you have read the book yourselves (I hope). Unwinding is a process for unwanted teenagers to be disassembled or transplanted before the age of eighteen. However, whether or not he or she is “unwinded,” it is guaranteed that he or she will live on, just in a disassembled state. However, the process of unwinding happens throughout the book, and is seen as quite a controversy after a second world war, The Heartland War. To not spoil any endings, I will end it at that. However, I just wanted to emphasize on the disagreement between pro-life and pro-choice, or the two sides of the Heartland War.
            Pro-life and pro-choice is clearly the theme that needs to be addressed within this book. What made this book interesting was the author’s ability to hide or cover his views upon the modern term of abortion. In fact, the last few lines within the book reveal the authors thoughts through the main character, Connor. Shusterman wrote, “We have a right to our lives....We have a right to choose what happens to our bodies....We deserve to live in a world where both those things are possible.” Though I believe this book would be interesting to teach in a high school classroom, I would find it quite difficult to teach as well considering you aren’t supposed to be bias towards your view on modern issues, or at least I think so. With that being said, leaving the book to persuade readers doesn’t really do anything either, especially after those last lines. In a sense, it left the readers of the pro-life or pro-choice debate wondering.
            Another concept I want to discuss is the character development. One thing I want to discuss within class is the way in which characters (and readers!) are positioned to wonder what the term life means. For example, is unwinding seen as murder, or not? Characters within the book seem to develop because they don’t believe its murder based upon their consciousness. After furthering my knowledge on this book, I found a great question based upon the book that may also be touched on in class. Is consciousness the definitive element that makes up life? 
            Like I mentioned above, I love dystopian novels, which is why it is very easy for me to rate this book an A. However, not only do I love it for its dystopian theme, but also the way the author approached such a difficult issue. Though I think this book is fantastic, sometimes I feel like as teachers it is so difficult to teach these tough issues in class. However, whether or not they are difficult to teach, I do not believe that they should be ignored!